MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046367582

A comparative biogeochemical study of extant, and fossil gymnosperm wood from Axel Heiberg Island, Canada

2007· other· en· W7046367582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGymnospermPhytolithLarchFossil RecordHemicelluloseMacrofossilPaleobotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of the main lignin, polysaccharide and hemicellulose components of modern and fossil Metasequoia and Larix woods was conducted through the application of Py-GC/MS, tetramethylammonium .hydroxide (TMAH) thermochemolysis, 13C NMR, Py-MS and TG-DSC in order to discern the main similarities and differences between modern and fossil woods, an~ to discover the main reasons for their preservation, the main processes involved in the initial stages of fossilisation, and the palaeoenvironment associated with their depositional sites in Axel Heiberg Island, Canada. Four modern Larix species woods were compared to each other, and then to the only extant Metasequoia species wood to discover the exact similarities and .any differences between them. This was done because the exact species of fossil Larix and Metasequoia are unknown. No differences were found and it is assumed that as no differences exist between modern species, no differences exist between fossil species. The Py-GC/MS total ion chromatogram of the modern woods showed carbohydrate and guaiacyl lignin-derived compounds indicative of gymnosperm wood. A decrease in carbohydrates relative to the modern woods was discovered in the fossil woods and a relative increase in methoxyphenols and tannins. Similarities to the effects of degradation through fungal invasion were noted in the analysis of the fossil woods with a relatively decreased polysaccharide compared to their modern counterpart, with the possibility of fungal degradation during early diagenesis. The TMAH thermochemolysis total ion chromatograms showed an increase of threo/erythro 1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-1,2,3-trimethoxypropane (G14/G15 - long chain) over 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde/3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid methyl ester (G4/G6 - short chain) guaiacyl structures from modern to fossil. Similarities to the effects of degradation through fungal invasion were again noted in the analysis of the fossil woods where long chain guaiacyl structures dominate over the short chain guaiacyl structures, reinforcing the possibility of fungal input during early diagenesis. 13C NMR analysis highlighted an increase in side chain degradation from the guaiacyl units thus forming condensed guaiacyl structures, and a decrease in carbohydrate content from the fossil woods relative to the modern woods. Possible tannin input was detected contributing to wood preservation. TG-DSC and Py-MS analysis showed carbohydrate content decreased from modern relative to fossil sample and condensed lignin structures increased. Polysaccharides were shown to be more in abundance within the Metasequoia than Larix sample indicating less degradation had occurred. The fossil woods although degraded, had maintained their basic carbohydrate/lignin structure and were comparable to modern woods degraded through fungal invasion. In addition the nature of the degradation was found to resemble that caused by white rot fungi. The general state of degradation was less severe in the Metasequoia than the Larix. The Metasequoia wood had probably been deposited after that of the Larix and in different environmental conditions, being slightly anoxic, with less fungal input. The presence of tannins together with the subsequent extreme cold of Axel Heiberg Island probably contributed to the woods preservation over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207