Copper copies: 5 objects from the Horniman Museum re-created in 3D printed copper
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A collaboration between the Artist, The Horniman Museum London and Compound13 Lab Mumbai. Objects were originally chosen by members of The Compound13 Lab in Dharavi, Mumbai from the Horniman Museums collection. These ordinary objects corresponded to familial objects with value in their own community. Objects were scanned and reprinted at the Compound13 Lab during the Prisoners of Love research project and distributed through different communities. Exhibited at: Compound Terra Plastik ka Mela: Repair, Recycling, and Restoration: an interactive exhibition of social and environmental works from the Compound 13 Lab at the Maharashtra Nature Park, Dharavi, Mumbai, India, 10th April - 13th April 2023. OST, OPENing, 11 Angel Court, Moorgate, London EC2R 7HB, 29th - 30th September 2023. Mootookakio’ssin: Creating in Spacetime. Group Exhibtion, Dr. Margaret (Marmie) Perkins Hess Gallery, University of Lethbridge, Canada, Nov 6 - Dec 16, 2023 Agents of Deterioration. Group Exhibition, Lethaby Gallery London, 10th -12th January 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.410 | 0.090 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".