MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7046387391

Deep Learning for Object Relationships: Applications to Road Safety and Bin Picking

2024· dissertation· en· W7046387391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimum bounding boxObject (grammar)ClutterGRASPTask (project management)Object detectionArchitectureLift (data mining)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimating the relationships between objects is fundamental to certain problems that require an understanding of a scene captured by a camera. This object-relationship theme is explored in two contexts in this thesis: (i) the task of identifying relative placements of objects for bin picking in potential clutter and (ii) the task of estimating distances between vehicles in 3D given some wide-angle video. \n \nBin picking generally refers to the task of picking up an object in a bin with a robotic arm, given some measurement of the scene. This problem can have a number of challenges and difficulties, one of which being the potential for the objects in the scene to be piled up or in a clutter. If the target object to manipulate is partially occluded by other objects in the scene, there can be some difficulty not only in terms of detecting the object, but also in terms of deciding how to clear the way to this target object or how to grasp and lift it appropriately without damaging or excessively displacing the neighbouring objects. Herein is presented a deep-learning module to help deal with potentially cluttered scenes: To account for neighbouring objects when estimating the relationship between two objects, a graph-network architecture was designed and implemented. This architecture relies on the bounding boxes and feature maps that would be outputted by an upstream detector to estimate the relationships for pairs of detected objects. The starting edge and vertex attributes of this proposed graph-network architecture are bounding box coordinates (or values derived from such coordinates) and feature-map crops. In addition to this architecture, some definitions for precision and recall that are tailored to this problem are proposed for comparing a ground-truth graph to a predicted graph. Finally, the proposed architecture was evaluated against a baseline model using existing datasets: one containing computer-rendered images, and one with real images. \n \nThe problem of estimating distances between vehicles is motivated by the more general problem of estimating the risk of accidents at any given intersection or road segment. The number of traffic accidents per year in Canada, albeit generally decreasing, is still substantial. Estimating the risk of accident at any given traffic intersection or road segment could provide insight and actionable information to municipalities to help determine which intersection or road segment should be prioritized and potentially improved in order to increase road safety. To estimate this risk of accidents, tracking the number of close calls or near misses is more desirable than merely tracking the number of accidents, as it does not require the observer to wait for accidents to occur, and close calls are presumably much more frequent than actual accidents. In order to determine whether a close call has occurred, one could simply refer to the distance between any two given vehicles; although this is not a perfect metric for detecting close calls, it is a starting point and a metric that is simple and easy to interpret. As such, this thesis addresses the more specific problem of estimating distances between any two detected vehicles from wide-angle videos. The wide-angle nature of images or videos introduces a difficulty, as it challenges a core assumption of normal convolutional neural networks—that of translational equivariance. A size-estimation model which uses spherical convolutions was evaluated on a simple, artificial dataset, and results showed that the use of spherical convolutions, as opposed to normal planar convolutions, was able to offer better performance in the tested scenario. In addition to this work, a deep-learning module to estimate distances between vehicles, given some bounding box coordinates and an image, is proposed. An ablation study was performed on this distance-estimating architecture, the results of which quantified the amount of performance gain that could be attributed to the use of pixel information in addition to bounding-box coordinates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→