Development of Synchrotron Based Imaging Tools for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using an Induced Canine Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a disease that develops spontaneously in men and dogs, and the dog is an accepted model to study BPH in men. As the gland can also be the site of a malignant cancer, definitive diagnosis relies on histological evaluation of prostate tissue following an invasive biopsy. The use of a new imaging technique, synchrotron-based phase contrast computed tomography (PC-CT) for excised prostates shows great detail of the internal structure of the gland, comparable to that of low power histology. Considering this fact, our main objective was to induce BPH in dogs using a combination of hormones dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and estradiol and verify if PC-CT imaging of in situ prostate glands of live dogs allowed for improved non-invasive imaging details compared to conventional medical imaging modalities and early diagnosis of BPH. Two studies were conducted to achieve the objectives. The first study involved the induction of BPH using intact male dogs with DHT and estradiol. The control group (n=3) received triolein carrier and the BPH induction group (n=3) received the hormone combination of DHT and estradiol (dissolved in triolein) injections three times/week for 35 weeks. Parameters that were assessed to diagnosis BPH were in vivo prostate volumes calculated using computed tomography (CT) images, volume of excised prostates determined using water displacement, 3D measurements of the excised gland, semen analysis, digital rectal exam (DRE), hormone analysis (estradiol, testosterone, DHT and canine prostate specific esterase CPSE), morphometric analysis and histological assessment of the tissue slides. The results showed that the gland volumes calculated both in vivo and ex vivo and the 3D measurements from BPH induction group were numerically higher than the control group. Sperm count decreased for all dogs but was reduced to zero or almost zero in the BPH induction group. The CPSE hormone analysis indicated that 1 dog from the treatment and 1 dog from the control group had BPH according to the manufacture’s defined threshold value. DHT hormone levels were higher for the induction group than controls throughout the entire study. This consequently affected the endogenous testosterone and estradiol, which were both decreased due to the negative feedback in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. For DRE, prostates from all dogs were found to be enlarged in size by the end of the study and the histological diagnosis revealed that all dogs have a certain degree of BPH. The second study involved the imaging of all six dogs with conventional non-invasive modalities (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI; CT; positron emission tomography, PET-CT; ultrasound, US; radiographs) plus the innovative PC-CT technique at the Canadian Light Source (CLS). None of these techniques resulted in images with the same level of fine detail as that obtained with previous PC-CT imaging of excised canine prostates. Comparisons among images from the various modalities determined that the best modality for the visualization of the internal structures of the prostate gland such as capsule, parenchyma, septa, lobe, urethra and cysts was MRI (T2), followed by US and CT. PC-CT images were comparable with PET-CT, allowing the visualization of the lobes and urethra filled with tracer. In conclusion, all dogs developed BPH, either spontaneously (control group) or following induction (treatment group). Also, images of the in situ prostate gland of dogs were acquired for the first time at the CLS with the PC-CT technique. Although the quality and resolution was not as expected in comparison with PC-CT images of excised canine prostates, this technique shows promise and with additional study and development has the potential to become a useful diagnostic methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".