MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046424845

Dimensión cultural de la renovación urbana un análisis retórico del urbanismo contemporáneo

2013· article· es· W7046424845 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Main Institutional Repository University of the North (Universidad del Norte) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanismRhetoricUrban planningPerspective (graphical)Urban structureUrban design
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ResumenA partir del ejemplo Saint-Roch en la Ciudad de Québec (Canadá), se analiza la retórica del discurso urbano que ha impulsado y justificado, en la última década, el proyecto de revitalización de las zonas urbanas más antiguas en las ciudades de América del Norte. El objetivo central es el de aportar, desde la perspectiva de la geografía cultural, a la comprensión del llamado ‘nuevo urbanismo’, que parece tener gran éxito tanto en la práctica como en la opinión pública. Se explica además cómo emergieron un conjunto de ideas sobre el urbanismo que, paradójicamente, han sido utilizadas para justificar: (1) la protección del patrimonio construido, al tiempo que permite usos innovadores del mismo; (2) la diversidad de usos del patrimonio urbano, excluyendo a la vez ciertas opciones; (3) la necesidad de un urbanismo participativo, a la vez que reconoce la imposibilidad de incluir ciertas categorías sociales.AbstractUsing the example of the Saint-Roch district in Quebec City (Canada), this paper is an analysis of the rhetoric of urban discourse which for the last decade or so has driven and justified the revitalization project of older urban areas in North American cities. The goal here is to add from a cultural geography perspective to the understanding of this so-called new urbanism which seems to have great success in both practice and public opinion. This paper will firstly demonstrate that this discourse is built essentially as a self-criticism, since its fundamental principle is to recognize the failure or post World War II urbanism which favoured the renewal of older urban areas through large scale demolition and systematic reconstruction. Next, this paper explains that on this basis a set of figures has emerged which have paradoxically been used to justify: (1) the protection of built heritage while at the same time allowing for innovative uses of this heritage; (2) the diversity of uses of urban heritage while at the same time actively excluding certain options; (3) the necessity for participatory urbanism while at the same time acknowledging the impossibility of including certain social categories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace Main Institutional Repository University of the North (Universidad del Norte)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207