El Hor / El Ha: Streichholzer. Prosaskizzen, Erzahlungen und andere Texte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El Hors / El Has short texts appeared in major journals from 1908 onwards, often on the same page as those by Gottfried Benn, Robert Musil, Robert Walser, Rilke, Max Brod or Kafka. She was praised as a “genius of the sketch”, above all because she was able to sketch the cruel abysses of erotic entanglements from a female perspective without moralizing with just a few strokes. In the early 1990s, around a quarter of her work was republished, namely the small books Die Schaukel and Schatten, which were published in 1913 and 1920. However, the author's unusual, anything but harmless oeuvre is more diverse and far more extensive than previously assumed. In addition to the well-known sketches, the volume presented here brings together more than 150 texts that have never been reprinted and in many cases have not even been bibliographically recorded, collects biographical evidence, including letters, as well as contemporary reviews, and makes the work and the author accessible with an afterword.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.225 | 0.189 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".