El dios Pan como representativo de la oposición naturaleza vs : civilización: de la Antigüedad al perÃodo eduardiano en Gran Bretaña
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recorreremos las diferentes connotaciones que fue imantando la figura del dios Pan en la literatura de la Antigüedad -con un muy breve paso por la Edad Media y el Renacimiento- y en la literatura británica, para intentar aprehender el sinnúmero de simbologías que, a través de las lecturas y las influencias sucesivas, llegaron hasta el contexto histórico-cultural eduardiano (aprox. 1900-1914) y formaron parte de la estructura del sentir (Williams, 2000) dentro de la cual J. M. Barrie creó su personaje Peter Pan como re?creación de la deidad griega. Los dominios de Pan en Arcadia se conectan con la literatura para niños, ya que son ellos -junto con los poetas- quienes tienen todavía permitido el acceso a ese lugar, y pueden oír el «llamado» que Peter/Pan hace con su flauta, del mismo modo en que ellos son quienes pueden disfrutar de esas lecturas y a quienes estas están dirigidas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".