Efeito do "PMSG" de Diferentes Origens na Superovolucao de Camundongos.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foram superovuladas femeas de camundongo com PMSG de diferentes origens: nacional (PMSG-N), da Franca (PMSG-F), e do Canada (PMSG-C). Foram estudadas duas curvas de resposta com PMSG-N, utilizando 5, 10 e 20 U.I., uma com embrioes coletados no estadio de duas celulas e a outra com embrioes coletados no estadio de morula. Para ambas as curvas houve um tratamento extra, usando a dosagem menor, no caso de duas celulas com PMSG-F, e de morula com PMSG-C. Nao houve diferenca estatisticamente significativa (P > 0,05) no numero de estruturas nem no numero de embrioes viaveis coletados entre as diferentes doses aplicadas de PMSG-N, tanto para os embrioes coletados no estadio de duas celulas como no de morula. Nos animais que receberam injecao de 5 U.I. de PMSG, houve uma diferenca estatisticamente significativa (P < 0,05) no numero de embrioes viáveis coletados dos animais que receberam injecao de PMSG-F e PMSG-C, em comparação com os que receberam PMSG-N, e no numero de estruturas coletadas entre os animais que receberam PMSG-N e PMSG-C. O número de embrioes viaveis coletados com 5 U.I. de PMSG-F e PMSG-C foi duas vezes maior do que o obtido com PMSG-N.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".