El liderazgo “étnico” y las redes personales dentro de la comunidad italiana migrante a partir del caso de la Confederación General de Federaciones Italianas en la República Argentina (FEDITALIA) (fines del siglo XIX y comienzos del XXI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo principal de esta investigación consiste en estudiar el modo en que fue ejercido el liderazgo en la comunidad italiana y analizar las redes personales que surgieron y se reprodujeron por el accionar de esos líderes. La tesis se enfoca, principalmente, en aquellos vínculos establecidos entre los grupos dirigentes en el interior de la comunidad, con funcionarios del gobierno italiano y con representantes del gobierno argentino. Para esto se ha tomado como punto de partida el espacio institucional configurado por la Confederación General de Federaciones Italianas en la República Argentina (FEDITALIA), otras asociaciones italianas de la Argentina y la prensa “étnica” peninsular, así como también instituciones y actores de la sociedad local.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".