Feminist Collections, v. 37, no. 1-2 (winter-spring 2016)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTENTS: From the Editors, by Ashley Hartman Annis (editorial intern) & JoAnne Lehman (senior editor); Book Reviews: “The Power of the Personal: Keeping Consciousness-Raising Alive,” by Stacy Russo, reviewing Janet L. Freedman, Reclaiming the Feminist Vision: Consciousness-Raising and Small Group Practice (McFarland, 2014); “Which Way Is Feminism Leaning? A Critique of Sandberg’s ‘Feminist Manifesto,’” by Ashley Hartman Annis, reviewing Sheryl Sandberg, Lean In for Graduates (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014) and Dawn Foster, Lean Out (London: Repeater Books, 2015); “Historiographic Production: Women’s & Gender History,” by Madeline A. Court, reviewing Pamela S. Nadell & Kate Haulman, eds., Making Women’s Histories: Beyond National Perspectives (New York University Press, 2013); “Considering Housework: An Uneven Anthology,” by Beverly Gordon, reviewing Elizabeth Patton & Mimi Choi, eds., Home Sweat Home: Perspectives on Housework & Modern Relationships (Rowman & Littlefield, 2014). \n“Who Gets to Keep the Baby? Reproductive Justice & the Discourse around ‘Bad’ Mothers,” by Rae Moors, reviewing Laury Oaks, Giving Up Baby: Safe Haven Laws, Motherhood, and Reproductive Justice (New York University Press, 2015); “Food Is a Feminist Issue: Women Reclaiming Autonomy & Protecting the Planet,” by Anna Pinks, reviewing Vandana Shiva, ed., Seed Sovereignty, Food Security: Women in The Vanguard of the Fight against GMOs and Corporate Agriculture (North Atlantic Books, 2016); “Striving for Clarity: A Complicated Comparison between Judaism & Islam Made Clear,” by Nicole Rudisill, reviewing Firoozeh Kashani-Sabet & Beth S. Wenger, eds., Gender in Judaism and Islam: Common Lives, Uncommon Heritage (New York University Press, 2015); Feminist Visions: “Films on Women & Gender,” highlighting productions featured in GPID Resource Bulletin (from Askold Kurov & Pavel Loparev; Bower Bird Films & Palangi Productions; Fork Films/Gini Reticker; Framewerk/Joey Boink & Sander Wirken; Guerilla Films/Iiris Härmä; Hanfgarn & Ufer Filmproduktion/Ayat Najafi; Principle Pictures/Beth Murphy; Radiator Film/Berit Madsen; Taskovski Films/Chloe Ruthven; Women Make Movies/Joanna Lipper); Periodical Notes: Special women/gender-themed issues or sections of the following non-women/gender journals: Canadian Review of Sociology; Culture, Health, & Sexuality; Intellectual History Review; Journal of British Cinema & Television; Journal of Vocational Education & Training; Psychoanalysis, Culture, & Society; The Progressive; Representation; Scandinavian Journal of History; Social Movement Studies; South Atlantic Quarterly; Sport in History; Spring: A Journal of Archetype & Culture; Items of Note: UW–Madison’s Campus Women’s Center and its debut issue of Intersections: A Feminist Publication; Headmistress Press and its Lesbian Poet Trading Cards; Books Recently Received: Complimentary/review copies of new titles, donated to the GWS Librarian’s office by various publishers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".