MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7046849843

Efficacy and safety of low dose compound betamethasone in the treatment of mild knee osteoarthritis

2021· article· en· W7046849843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisBetamethasoneWOMACSodium hyaluronateKnee JointAdverse effect
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of low-dose \ncompound betamethasone in the treatment of mild knee osteoarthritis. Methods: From \nSeptember 2018 to December 2019, 90 patients with mild knee osteoarthritis were divided into \ncomplete dose group and low dose group according to the treatment sequence, 45 cases in each \ngroup. The complete dose group was treated with intra-artiular injection of betamethasone(1ml) \nand sodium hyaluronate(2ml), once a week, three times as a course of treatment. The low \ndose group was treated with intra-artiular injection of betamethasone(0.3ml) and sodium \nhyaluronate(2ml), once a week, three times as a course of treatment. Lysholm scores、 the \nWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual \nanalogue scale (VAS) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, and \nthe efficacy and safety of the two groups were evaluated. Results: 80 patients were followed \nup with an average of (4.96 ± 1.50) months ranging from 3 to 8 months, and 10 cases (11.11%) \nwere dropped out, including 2 cases in the complete dose group, 2 cases in the midway \nwithdrawal group, and 1 case in the treatment course less than the treatment course; 3 cases \nin the low dose group lost the follow-up, and 2 cases dropped out. Compared with that before \ntreatment, Lysholm scores were significantly improved, WOMAC scores and VAS scores were \nsignificantly decreased in the two groups at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment \n(P < 0.001). The Lysholm scores of low dose group were78.10 ± 2.16, 86.78 ± 2.55, 80.90 \n± 2.26, WOMAC scores were 61.00±1.38, 39.03±1.98, 45.76±1.66 and VAS scores were \n2.23±0.89, 0.78±0.73 and 1.05±0.85 in low dose group at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks after \ntreatment. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No drugrelated \nadverse reactions occurred in both groups. Conclusion: The curative effect of low dose \ncompound betamethasone intra-articular injection in the treatment of mild knee osteoarthritis is \nequivalent to that of complete dose compound betamethasone. It can improve the function and \nsymptoms of knee joint, and is safe and effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→