Energy demand and carbon emissions reduction potential of dynamic pricing of electricity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental evidence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demand response has been recognised as a critical element in the transition to low carbon energy systems. It is hoped that shifting demand through price incentives can reduce energy consumption and facilitate the electrification of heat and transport. However, a rigorous assessment of the existing evidence from field trials using time-of-use pricing, critical peak pricing, real-time pricing or rebates to influence household energy use is missing. Previous reviews have also relied on evidence from utility-reports in the United States and Canada and evidence from pricing experiments in Europe, East Asia and developing Asia has not been accounted. Here, we address this gap by employing a machine learning-assisted systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and quasi-experimental pilots aimed at shifting or reducing the energy demand of households during peak and off-peak hours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it