MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046921180

Estudo das competências psicomotoras em pessoas idosas institucionalizadas e a residir na comunidade com diferentes níveis de apoio

2025· dissertation· pt· W7046921180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Universidade de Évora (Universidade de Évora) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotocathodes and Microchannel Plates
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlder peopleElderly peopleAffect (linguistics)CognitionQuality of life (healthcare)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este estudo visa compreender o perfil psicomotor da pessoa idosa e as suas implicações na promoção de um envelhecimento ativo e saudável. A pesquisa procura contribuir com novos conhecimentos que melhorem as práticas e intervenções em gerontopsicomotricidade, com foco na caracterização e análise comparativa do perfil psicomotor, da independência nas atividades diárias, do estado cognitivo, da qualidade de vida, do bem-estar e dos riscos sociais e de saúde, em idosos que vivem de forma independente na comunidade (G1), com apoio domiciliário (G2) ou em instituições (G3). Metodologia: A investigação adotou um design transversal, observacional e analítico, com 179 participantes idosos, com idades entre os 65 e os 96 anos, recrutados em Elvas, sendo 69,3% mulheres. Os instrumentos de avaliação incluíram o Exame Geronto-Psicomotor, Composite Physical Function, Easy-Care e Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Resultados: Foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os três grupos. O perfil psicomotor apresentou diferenças significativas (p < 0,05), com maiores variações entre os idosos da comunidade e os institucionalizados. Em termos cognitivos, os idosos da comunidade demonstraram melhor desempenho que os dos outros dois grupos (p < 0,05). A independência nas atividades da vida diária também mostrou diferenças significativas (p < 0,05), sendo maior no grupo comunitário independente. A análise da qualidade de vida, bem-estar e riscos sociais e de saúde revelou maiores discrepâncias entre o G1 e o G3. Conclusão: Os resultados indicam que os idosos a viver de forma independente na comunidade apresentam melhores resultados em todos os parâmetros analisados. As intervenções psicomotoras precoces são essenciais para um envelhecimento saudável, sendo recomendada a estimulação psicomotora em todos os III contextos, com foco na melhoria ou manutenção das capacidades psicomotoras para promover uma melhor qualidade de vida, saúde e bem-estar. - Abstract Study of psychomotor skills in institutionalized elderly people living in the community with different levels of support Objective: This study aims to understand the psychomotor profile of the elderly and its implications for promoting active and healthy aging. The research seeks to contribute with new knowledge that improves practices and interventions in gerontopsychomotricity, focusing on the characterization and comparative analysis of the psychomotor profile, independence in daily activities, cognitive state, quality of life, well-being and social and health risks, in elderly people who live independently in the community (G1), with home support (G2) or in institutions (G3). Methodology: The research adopted a cross-sectional, observational and analytical design, with 179 elderly participants, aged between 65 and 96 years, recruited in Elvas, 69.3% of whom were women. Assessment instruments included the Geronto-Psychomotor Examination, Composite Physical Function, Easy-Care and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the three groups. The psychomotor profile showed significant differences (p < 0.05), with greater variations between community-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. In cognitive terms, the elderly in the community demonstrated better performance than those in the other two groups (p < 0.05). Independence in activities of daily living also showed significant differences (p < 0.05), being greater in the independent community group. Analysis of quality of life, well-being and social and health risks revealed greater discrepancies between G1 and G3. Conclusion: The results indicate that elderly people living independently in the community present better results in all parameters analyzed. Early psychomotor interventions are essential for healthy aging, and psychomotor stimulation is recommended in all contexts, with a focus on improving or maintaining psychomotor capabilities to promote better quality of life, health and well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it