MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046964031

Estudo comparativo de expressões idiomáticas do português do Brasil e de Portugual e do francês da França e do Canadá

2014· other· fr· W7046964031 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) · 2014
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Measure (data warehouse)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche fait l’objet d’un inventaire d’expressions idiomatiques en portugais du Portugal et en français du Canada (Québec), équivalentes aux expressions en portugais du Brésil et en français de France qui composent les entrées du Dictionnaire électronique d’expressions idiomatiques français-portugais / portugais-français (XATARA, 2007). Pour cela on a considéré le concept d’expression idiomatique d’après les études phraséologiques et la fréquence d’usage des équivalences proposées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista)Same topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207