MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7047032684

Enhancing the water solubility of MyoNovin - a novel skeletal muscle regenerator

2015· dissertation· en· W7047032684 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionDiafiltrationFusible alloyTSG101Gestational periodProteogenomicsTubulopathy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite precursor cells are normally quiescent but once activated they support skeletal muscle growth and regeneration by proliferating and differentiating into myoblasts. When an animal suffers from a muscle injury, quiescent satellite precursor cells are activated by nitric oxide (NO). MyoNovin (1-(3,4-Bis-nitrooxy-butoxy)-2-methoxy-benzene), as a NO donor, was developed to provide nitric oxide directly to the skeletal muscle and has been shown to promote satellite cell activation. A potential drawback of the current MyoNovin molecule is its poor water solubility. The aim of this work was to enhance the water-solubility of MyoNovin in order to improve its ease of formulation and possibly enhance its biological activity. The structure of MyoNovin (MN1) was modified with three different functional groups - methanesulfonyl (MN2), benzoic acid (MN3) and acetamide (MN4). The three novel MyoNovin analogs were identified and shown to have similar biological activity as with MyoNovin. All three MyoNovin analogs were found to have better water solubility.#Based on these results, two of the MyoNovin analogs (MN2 and MN3) had much better biological activity with respect to satellite activation and much improved water solubility and may be the most promising candidates for future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→