Expansion of the Nebraska Winter Severity Index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the Nebraska Department of Transportation (NDOT), the Nebraska Winter Severity Index (NEWINS) provided an independent framework to calculate a winter season’s severity by categorizing individual winter storms. However, one of the greatest limitations of NEWINS is that it is not predictive. Thus, this study builds on the previously developed NEWINS by creating a predictive winter storm severity index known as NEWINS-Predictive (NEWINS-P). The quantitative precipitation forecast, snow accumulation, ice accumulation, and surface wind speed parameters from the National Digital Forecast Database (NDFD) are used to develop the five components composing the NEWINS-P framework. These components consist of snow severity (NEWINS-S), precipitation type, ice likelihood, blowing snow, and drifting snow likelihood, and attempt to forecast different in-storm and post-storm winter weather hazards over a 72-h duration at a 6-h resolution. The NEWINS-P framework is assessed through spatial forecasts across Nebraska and temporal forecasts at Nebraska airports on select Colorado Low and Alberta Clipper Systems from the 2018-19, 2021-22, and 2022-23 winter seasons. Additionally, spatial and temporal forecast trends are investigated in each system for select components to assess their degree of change. The results show that Colorado Low Systems were forecasted to have a larger areal extent and longevity of winter weather hazards than Alberta Clipper Systems. Furthermore, the Colorado Low Systems produce a higher intensity and spatial coverage of NEWINS-S, more types of precipitation, more icing concerns, and more blowing snow concerns. Post-storm impacts such as drifting snow are not forecasted in most systems as surface wind speeds decrease rapidly following the conclusion of snow accumulation. In all systems analyzed, the forecast trends reveal an increasing intensity of NEWINS-S as the system gets closer in time. Interpretations of the NEWINS-P output can be affected by a systematic artifact within the NDFD that is caused by forecast differences between weather forecast offices. In summary, NEWINS-P is a tool that supports NDOT in its winter maintenance operations for personnel and resource planning in advance of winter storms. Advisors: Liang Chen and Mark R. Anderson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".