MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7047158111

Evaluation of the implication of different cellular ligands in cadmium, copper, and zinc sequestration in freshwater bivalves

2004· other· fr· W7047158111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2004
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZincDetoxicationDreissenaHeavy metals
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'objectif de ce travail de thèse était d'évaluer l'implication de différents ligands cellulaires dans la séquestration du cadmium, du cuivre et du zinc chez des Mollusques bivalves. Dans le cadre d'une exposition chronique de spécimens de Pyganodon grandis récoltés dans neuf lacs de la région de Rouyn-Noranda (Québec), la concentration en Cd accumulé dépend à la fois de la concentration en métal dissous, de la nature et de l'abondance des ligands de l'organe considéré (branchies versus glande digestive). Dans la glande digestive, le Cd est largement séquestré par la métallothionéine (MT) alors que dans les branchies les granules représentent le principal site de stockage des trois métaux étudiés. Une expérience de transplantation, impliquant un changement de régime d'exposition, a permis de montrer la précocité de la fixation du Cd au niveau des granules qui apparaît concomitante à l'induction de MT. Une approche de biologie moléculaire réalisée sur Dreissena polymorpha au laboratoire visait à étudier la précocité de la réponse d'une isoforme MT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→