MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047175533

Finding our Place in the Garden

2023· article· en· W7047175533 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsCapilano University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedContext (archaeology)IndigenousSituated learningIndigenous educationTraditional knowledge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With our bearings of place as assemblage, as political, and as driven by context and locality, we share our story of encountering the community garden on the campus of Capilano University in North Vancouver, and our evolving relationship to this place. In exploring our relationship to place, we recognize the importance of place-conscious learning for children, students, and educators in the context of our time, as we are living in a climate crisis, and are situated as settlers on stolen Indigenous land. Throughout this inquiry, we have been oriented toward theory in early childhood education that lives within poststructuralist and reconceptualist frameworks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0280.022
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207