MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047181804

Evaluation of the Economy of the Village

2016· dissertation· cs· W7047181804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Production (economics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bakalářská práce se zabývá hospodařením obce Holasice. Práce se v teoretické části věnuje vymezení základních pojmů, jakými jsou obec a její charakteristika, působnost obce, rozpočtová politika obce při sestavování rozpočtu atd. Analytická část bakalářské práce analyzuje příjmy a výdaje obce Holasice. Součástí analýzy je rovněž finanční analýza hospodaření obce. Hlavním cílem bakalářské práce je vyhodnocení hospodaření obce a sestavení návrhů k vylepšení rozpočtu. Vyhodnocení analýzy a návrhy k vylepšení rozpočtu obce se nachází v závěru bakalářské práce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207