Factores de riesgo de mortalidad en el primer año tras fractura periprotésica de fémur tipo C de Vancouver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La fractura periprotésica tipo C de Vancouver en fémur (FPP VC) es una fractura distal al vástago de una prótesis de cadera. Por este motivo habitualmente no requiere cirugía de recambio de prótesis y se trata mediante fijación interna (placa y tornillos o clavo endomedular). La mortalidad de esta patología es elevada y debido a su progresivo aumento en la incidencia resulta de interés estudiar sus factores de riesgo. La fractura periprotésica de fémur tipo C de Vancouver asocia una elevada mortalidad al año. No existen diferencias significativas en mortalidad entre los diferentes tipos de fijación. La presencia de complicaciones médicas y quirúrgicas son factores de riesgo. Este estudio define los factores de riesgo de mortalidad para realizar un tratamiento individualizado y mejorar el pronóstico de estos pacientes. No obstante son necesarios más trabajos que comparen todos los tipos de tratamientos e incluyan más variables para elaborar la estrategia más adecuada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".