Fabrication of large-area polymeric membranes with micro and nano aperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of membranes of different materials, including radical and cationic UV lacquer, PFPE urethane methacrylate UV resin (MD700), optical adhesive UV resin with high refractive index (NOA84), as well as thermally curable polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) have been successfully fabricated by using a simple, yet robust method. The membranes are replicated from an intermediate template with micro- or nano-pillars by using the spontaneous capillary flow (SCF) method. The polymerization is done either by UV or thermal curing. The size of the pores in the membrane ranges from 100 μm down to 200 nm. The thickness of the membranes varies from 10 μm up to 100 μm. As high as 16 of aspect ratio (the thickness of the membrane to the diameter of the pore) has been achieved in membranes with thickness of 100 μm and 6 μm pore diameter. Uniform open-through hole membranes with pore size of 15 μm and thickness of 30 μm over an area of 44×44 mm2 have also been achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".