MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047368504

Geothermal Assessment of Paleozoic Aquifers in the Central Alberta Basin, Canada

2015· article· en· W7047368504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHelmholtz-Alberta InitiativeUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsForeland basinGeothermal gradientStructural basinDevonianPaleozoicAquiferSedimentary rockHydrothermal circulationSedimentary basinFacies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Alberta Basin as foreland basin of the Rocky Mountains is known for its resources of oil, gas and coal. Due to its characteristic flexure of the foreland lithosphere this basin type deepens significantly towards the orogenic belt. These foreland deeps host potentially sedimentary layers containing hot fluids and structurally or facies controlled high permeability domains. Two Focus regions are studied by well data analysis, 2D seismic sections, stress field analysis and temperature modeling. The study areas are\nlocated around the city of Edmonton in central Alberta (basin depth 1.8 – 3.5km) and in northeastern Alberta around the town of Peace River (basin depth 1.7 – 2.4 km). Extension and thickness of potential geothermal target formations is investigated by 3D structural geological modeling, and geostatistical methods are applied to analyze the distribution of porosity, permeability and temperature within these formations. For central Alberta, the medium to coarse grained Cambrian Basal Sandstone Unit is the most\npromising formation for deep geothermal applications. This potential hydrothermal resource could be used for district heating in the Edmonton metropolitan area, where the Cambrian Sandstone is located at a depth of 2.2 – 2.7km with a temperature of 78 – 93°C.\nFluids from overlying Upper Devonian porous carbonates host fluids up to 63°C. In northeastern Alberta, warm fluids (51-75°C)from the siliciclastic Granite Wash Unit could be used for heating of greenhouses. Considering the climatic conditions in Alberta with its long and cold winter season, the temperature range between 60-90°C of hydrothermal resources seems to be efficient in highly populated areas with high heat demand as the metropolitan region of Edmonton, remote areas on northern Canada where fuel\nfor heating needs to be transported by helicopters, or generally in Canada to grow local food in greenhouses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it