MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047500767

Gli affreschi di Giovan Francesco Romanelli nella Galleria Mazzarino a Parigi

2021· article· it· W7047500767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Age groupsArt gallery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gli affreschi della Galleria di Mazzarino a Parigi realizzati del pittore viterbese Giovan Francesco Romanelli non hanno attirato per lungo tempo l’attenzione degli studiosi e, ad eccezione di sporadici accenni, la decorazione pittorica è stata quasi completamente ignorata dalla critica. Obiettivo della tesi è proporre una genesi degli affreschi analizzando singolarmente le scene, sia dal punto di vista stilistico che iconografico, in modo da fornire una chiara e ampia panoramica per una completa comprensione dei significati, e far emergere in maniera evidente il discorso celebrativo rivolto al committente, alluso negli affreschi. Inoltre, si delinea un quadro esaustivo della vita e dell'attività del pittore e dei suoi rapporti con il cardinale Mazzarino, mecenate e amatore d'arte. Infine viene tracciata la storia del Palazzo parigino ripercorrendo le sue origini modeste come Hôtel de Chevry-Tubeuf e le sue successive trasformazioni architettoniche e decorative che portarono prima alla nascita del Palais Mazarin e poi alla Biblioteca Nazionale di Francia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)Same topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207