MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047504242

Fair Labor Association?s 2005 Annual Public Report

2005· article· en· W7047504242 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillMarquette UniversityUniversity of MemphisIllinois State UniversityFordham UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of Notre DameLouisiana State UniversitySyracuse UniversityUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of KansasCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of DaytonMichigan State UniversityCreighton UniversityHarvard UniversityYork UniversityNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MissouriMichigan Technological UniversityOhio State UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroLake Forest CollegeUniversity of PennsylvaniaMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyNorth Carolina State UniversityUniversity of MainePurdue UniversityFurman UniversityGeorgia Institute of TechnologyDartmouth CollegeFlorida State University
KeywordsLabor relationsPublic policyWork (physics)Industrial relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Provides an analysis of activities of participating companies as they attempt to improve working condition. Discusses the implications for global labor standards with the end of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeCommons (Cornell University)Same topicPulsed Power Technology ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207