Il y a une lumière au bout du tunnel... est-ce un train?: les perceptions des finissants du Programme du Diplôme de l'International Baccalaureate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les éducateurs se demandent souvent ce qui était l’impact des programmes qu’ils offrent aux élèves. Cette recherche explore les perceptions des finissants du Programme du diplôme de l’International Baccalaureate une fois qu’ils ont terminé la première année d’études universitaires. Dans ce contexte, cette étude vise la participation de cinq diplômés du Programme au Manitoba et emploie une méthodologie qualitative de l’étude de cas (Yin, 2002) basée dans le socioconstructivisme (Vygotsky, 1978) afin d’explorer les perceptions de ces diplômés. Les principes et les méthodes de la Théorisation ancrée (Charmaz, 2006) ont guidé la collecte des données, l’analyse, et l’interprétation. Les résultats de cette étude offrent un aperçu du vécu des participants dans le Programme afin de comprendre leur motivation à choisir le Programme, l’atmosphère du Programme, le rôle des éducateurs dans le Programme ainsi que l’impact du Programme au-delà des études secondaires. Il serait recommandé de continuer l’exploration des perspectives de divers anciens élèves du Programme – finissants ou pas - provenant d’autres pays et d’une variété d’écoles. Educators often wonder about the impact of the programs they offer their students. This study explores the perceptions of the graduates of the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme once they have finished the first year of university studies. The study centres on the participation of five Manitoba graduates. A qualitative case study methodology (Yin, 2002) based on socio-constructivism (Vygotsky, 1978) was used to explore the perceptions of these graduates while the principles and methods of Grounded Theory (Chamaz, 2006) guided the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. The results of the study offer an insight into the motivation for selecting the Diploma Programme, the atmosphere within the Programme, the role of educators in the Programme as well as the impact of the Programme beyond the high school level. Recommendations include further exploration of the perceptions of former students of the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, be they graduates or not, from diverse countries and a wide variety of schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".