Hubungan antara Alexithymia dengan Child Neglect Pada Orang Tua yang memiliki Tingkat Pendidikan Rendah di Desa Paoh Benua
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara alexithymia dengan child neglect pada orang tua berpendidikan rendah di Desa Paoh Benua, Sepauk, Kabupaten Sintang. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 147 orang tua berpendidikan rendah di Desa Poah Benua. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan dua Skala yaitu alexithymia (16 aitem) dan child neglect (20 aitem). Sampling yang digunakan teknik cluster random sampling, sedangkan analisis data penelitian menggunakan teknik pearson product moment. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan koefisien korelasi (r) sebesar 0,252 dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 0,002 (p<0,01) yang artinya terdapat hubungan positif yang sangat signifikan antara alexithymia dan child neglect. Alexithymia memberikan sumbangan efektif sebesar 6% terhadap Child Neglect. Artinya, sekitar 94% didapatkan dari variabel lain. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data penelitian, dapat disimupulkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang positif antara alexithymia dengan child neglect pada orang tua berpendidikan rendah di Desa Paoh Benua.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".