HUBUNGAN RELIGIOUS COPING DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA PEREMPUAN DEWASA AWAL DI PEKANBARU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perempuan dewasa awal lebih rentan mengalami quarter life crisis akibat tekanan sosial yang kompleks seperti tuntutan karier, hubungan interpersonal, dan pencarian makna hidup. quarter life crisis dapat berdampak negatif, terutama secara emosional, sehingga diperlukan religious coping untuk menghadapi tekanan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara religious coping (positive dan negative) dengan quarter life crisis pada perempuan dewasa awal di Pekanbaru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan pendekatan korelasional. Partisipan dalam penelitian berjumlah 347 perempuan dewasa awal berusia 20-24 tahun dan berdomisili di Pekanbaru. Instrumen yang digunakan terdiri dari skala Brief RCOPE dan skala Quarter Life Crisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara negative religious coping dengan quarter life crisis, sedangkan positive religious coping tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa coping keagamaan yang bersifat negatif justru berpotensi memperburuk krisis yang dialami, sementara coping positif tidak cukup kuat dalam mereduksi tekanan emosional yang muncul selama fase quarter life crisis. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya pendekatan religius yang sehat dan adaptif dalam mendukung kesehatan mental perempuan dewasa awal. Kata kunci: quarter life crisis, religious coping, positive religious coping, negative religious coping, perempuan dewasa awal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".