MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047753773

Joint Law-Business Case Study Competition Program

2017· article· en· W7047753773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada-United States law journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotocathodes and Microchannel Plates
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)Competition lawNegotiationJoint (building)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article offers information on Joint Law-Business Case Study Competition project. It mentions about competition will provide law students growth of interdisciplinary learning; and will provide Canada-United States Law Institute and its supporting institutions with a unique student competition experience of Moot Court model. It also mentions about use of negotiation agreements in commercial law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada-United States law journalSame topicPhotocathodes and Microchannel PlatesFrench-language works237,207