MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047757790

Ice-nucleating particles in the central Arctic

2021· other· en· W7047757790 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticAerosolArctic ice packThe arcticArctic geoengineeringIce nucleus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A small subset of aerosol particles can induce ice-nucleation in supercooled liquid droplets. These ice-nucleating particles (INP) are responsible for the primary, heterogeneous nucleation of ice in clouds, and knowledge of their concentrations, sources and characteristics is necessary to accurately represent these mixed-phased clouds in models. This is particularly important in regions such as the central Arctic Ocean, where there are persistent mixed-phased clouds that help shape the radiative budget of the Arctic but very few measurements of INP, none of which are at cloud altitude. This thesis aimed to tackle the dearth of central Arctic INP data through the design and use of novel instrumentation, and a field campaign aboard an icebreaker which saw measurements of INP measurements made at both ship and cloud level close to the North Pole (88-90°N). Firstly, a high-volume, size-selective aerosol sampler capable of being deployed for hours at a time at altitudes and temperatures relevant for mixed phased clouds was designed and tested. This sampler was used on a 2-month campaign to the central Arctic ocean from August-September 2018, alongside ship-based INP measurements. The central Arctic INP concentrations at sea-level were highly variable, with concentrations as low as could be expected in the Southern Oceans, and as high as those measured in rural farmland. The INP were found to be heat-sensitive, and the most active samples originated from the Arctic coasts of Russia. The samples with the least INP activity were from the pack ice and Canadian Arctic. The concentrations measured at cloud-level were often decoupled from those at the surface, demonstrating the necessity for more airborne measurements of INP. Additionally, the INP at cloud-level were often smaller than expected, at <0.25 μm in aerodynamic diameter. Finally, in order to better probe the characteristics of sampled INP in the future, a microfluidic device capable of sorting ice crystals containing INP active at a specific temperature from the bulk sample was developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Same topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207