MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047784405

Impact of browsing after burning on aspen growth and litter decomposition

2018· article· en· W7047784405 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersParks Canada
KeywordsExclosureManureVegetation (pathology)OvergrazingSynchronismPlant litter
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manitoba has a small number of rough fescue (Festuca hallii) grasslands, which are commonly utilized by elk for winter grazing in upland Manitoba. Aspen encroachment currently threatens these grasslands within Riding Mountain National Park, where augmentation of grasslands is a priority. This study examined the interaction between browsing and fire on aspen growth, the effect of browser manure on aspen leaf decomposition, and examined soil profiles to identify historic grasslands. Browsing simulations were carried out within exclosures across sites with-and-without recent burns to measure the effect of browsing alone versus a combination of fire and browsing. To assess the effect of browsing on the apical shoot, a subset of trees was randomly assigned an apical shoot manual-removal. High intensity of clipping was effective to suppress aspen, but fire had no effect. Field-placed litter bags were used to measure the effect of ungulate manure on aspen litter decay. Soil fecal incubation were used to measure the release over two months of plant-available N as nitrate-N (NO3-N) and ammonium-N (NH4-N) in soil. The manure amendments used in both studies were bison and a wild-ungulate blend of deer, elk and moose. Aspen decomposition was seen at rates known for other studies, but manure was without impact. In addition, the use of soil organic carbon (SOC) at depth as an indicator for historic grasslands was tested. In grasslands, a large portion of the organic matter input is from fibrous root systems within the mineral soil. In forest, most of the residue input is from leaves falling to the litter layer above the mineral soil on the forest floor. Stoniness and soil texture were included with SOC to better characterize the sites. Soil pits were dug at long-term forested sites, long-term prairie sites, and recently forested sites. Samples were taken at depth intervals of 10 cm. Stoniness at depth was associated with grassland and recent forest cover, but not long-term forest. SOC patterns reflected litter inputs and suggest historic cycling of prairie and aspen cover on stony sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it