Influencia de la ingeniería geotécnica en la intervención y resultados por niveles de servicio en la carretera Huancavelica – Lircay – Huallapampa – La Mejorada – Acobamba – Puente Allccomachay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de la tesis es poner en conocimiento la efectividad que tiene la ingeniería Geotécnica para la aprobación de los niveles de servicios en contratos de conservación vial y así poder conllevar un pavimento básico trabajando de forma satisfactoria. En esta investigación se empleo datos proporcionados por la empresa encargada de la carretera “CORREDOR HUANCAVELICA – LIRCAY –EMP-3S (HUALLAPAMPA) Y EMP. PE 3S (LAMEJORADA)-ACOBAMBA –EMP PE-3S (PUENTE ALCOMACHAY)” y de los resultados de los ensayos realizados en la misma carretera. La tesis tiene un Diseño de Investigación Experimental, Longitudinal y Retrospectivo; así mismo, en el Tipo de Investigación es Cuantitativo, Explicativo y Descriptivo. Para comprobar tal situación se analizan los resultados de la evaluación por niveles de servicio del mantenimiento de la carretera y se comparan con los ensayos geotécnicos de la calidad de los materiales usados, proporcionados por la empresa encargada del mantenimiento del corredor vial, para así llegar a la conclusión que mantener una eficiente ingeniería geotécnica conlleva a tener un pavimento básico trabajando adecuadamente. \n \nThe aim of the thesis is to inform the effectiveness Geotechnical Engineering has to approve the Service Level in Road Maintenance Contracts and so to lead UN Working basic pavement so yes satisfactoria.En esta Employment Research Data provided by Responsible company's "RB Huancavelica. - Lircay -EMP-3S (Huallapampa) and EMP PE 3S (LAMEJORADA) -ACOBAMBA -EMP PE-3S (BRIDGE ALCOMACHAY)" road and the results of tests carried out on the same road. The thesis has a design of Experimental, longitudinal and retrospective research; Even so, in the kind of research it is quantitative explanatory and descriptive. V To check this situation the evaluation results are analyzed by levels of service and road maintenance compared with geotechnical quality testing of used materials provided by the Company that the maintenance of the corridor, Asi para Arrive concluded that maintaining efficient Geotechnical Engineering involves a pavement Having a basic working properly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".