Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueTexas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Air ForceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at AustinDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyInternational Development Research CentreArmy Research LaboratoryUniversity of Texas at AustinCarnegie Mellon UniversityDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at AustinTsinghua UniversitySociety for Research in Child DevelopmentTulane UniversityNational Science FoundationUniversity of MinnesotaWake Forest UniversityHarvard UniversityNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of MissouriYale UniversityUniversity of Texas SystemAsia UniversityAmerican Academy of Arts and SciencesAmerican Psychological AssociationTechnische Universiteit DelftUnited TechnologiesU.S. Department of DefenseAmerican Association for the Advancement of ScienceGeorge Washington UniversityAmerican Society for Engineering EducationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of Washington
KeywordsDirectoryInformation systemWork (physics)
DOInot available
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexBiographical and contact information for the IC² Institute Fellows. Compiled on the occasion of the biannual IC² Institute Fellows Meeting in Austin, Texas, April 24-25, 2015.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
