MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7047925274

Informe de monitoreo ambiental de calidad de aire y suelo en el distrito y Provincia Constitucional del Callao, realizado del 17 al 24 de agosto de 2015

2015· report· es· W7047925274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2015
Typereport
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Mercury (programming language)Limiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presenta los resultados del monitoreo ambiental de calidad de aire y suelo en el distrito y Provincia Constitucional del Callao, realizado del 17 al 24 de agosto de 2015. Entre sus conclusiones para calidad de aire menciona que las concentraciones de plomo (Pb) obtenidas en todos los puntos de monitoreo no excedieron el valor estándar de 0,5 uJg/m3 para 24 horas, establecido en los Estándares de Calidad Ambiental de Aire (AAQC) de Ontario. No obstante, la concentración promedio más elevada se obtuvo en la estación CAHV01 -Callao (0, 1 56 ¡..Jg/m3) correspondiente a la Institución educativa María Reiche. Respecto a la calidad del suelo, señala que las concentraciones de mercurio total (Hg) obtenidas en todos los puntos de monitoreo, incluida la obtenida en el punto S-1 88, no excedieron el ECA para Hg (6,6 mg/kg), a excepción del punto S-08 que excedió tanto el ECA para Hg (en 2,7 veces) como la concentración obtenida en el punto S-1 88 (en 78 veces). Las concentraciones de plomo total (Pb) obtenidas en los puntos de monitoreo S-01 , S04, S-06, S-08, S-08A, S-1 2, S-1 7, KP-07, TP-08A, TP-09A y TP-10 excedieron el ECA para Pb (140 mg/kg).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→