MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7047926140

Invisible Frontiers: Robust and Risk-Sensitive Financial Decision-Making within Hidden Regimes

2023· other· en· W7047926140 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortfolioAmbiguityAmbiguity aversionMarkov decision processInvestment strategyRisk managementExpected utility hypothesisFinancial marketPortfolio optimizationReinsurance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this dissertation, we delve into the exploration of robust and risk-sensitive strategies for financial decision-making within hidden regimes, focusing on the effective portfolio management of financial market risks under uncertain market conditions. The study is structured around three pivotal topics, that is, Risk-sensitive Policies for Portfolio Management, Robust Optimal Life Insurance Purchase and Investment-consumption with Regime-switching Alpha-ambiguity Maxmin Utility, and Robust and Risk-sensitive Markov Decision Process with Hidden Regime Rules. In Risk-sensitive policies for Portfolio Management, we propose two novel Reinforcement Learning (RL) models. Tailored specifically for portfolio management, these models align with investors’ risk preference, ensuring the strategies balance between risk and return. In Robust Optimal Life Insurance Purchase and Investment-consumption with Regime-switching Alpha-ambiguity Maxmin Utility, we introduce a pre-commitment strategy that robustly navigates insurance purchasing and investment-consumption decisions. This strategy adeptly accounts for model ambiguity and individual ambiguity aversion within a regime-switching market context. In Robust and Risk-sensitive Markov Decision Process with Hidden Regime Rules, we integrate hidden regimes into Markov Decision Process (MDP) framework, enhancing its capacity to address both market regime shifts and market fluctuations. In addition, we adopt a risk-sensitive objective and construct a risk envelope to portray the worst-case scenario from RL perspective. Overall, this research strives to provide investors with the tools and insights for optimal balance between reward and risk, effective risk management and informed investment choices. The strategies are designed to guide investors in the face of market uncertainties and risk, further underscoring the criticality of robust and risk-sensitive financial decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→