MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047931946

Il Giardino spirituale di Arcangela Panigarola (1468-1525) e la devozione a Gesu Bambino. Note a margine,
\nin «Analecta Augustiniana», LXXXIV 21, pp. 93-114

2021· article· en· W7047931946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSisterMysticismCultQuarter (Canadian coin)AsceticismWork (physics)Period (music)Religious life
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is intended to examine the "Giardino spirituale", a short treatise \nof devout spiritual exercises and instructions addressed to nuns, composed in the first quarter of the sixteenth century by Sister Arcangela Panigarola, a mystic and prophetess who lived in the Milanese Augustinian monastery of Santa Marta. After briefly outlining the figure and work of Sister Arcangela, the essay investigates the spiritual allegories relating to the celebration of the cult of the Child Jesus, linked to the idea that every daily gesture must be accompanied by meditation. Panigarola in fact invites her nuns to build, through prayer, the cradle of Jesus, as well as the «lenzoletto», the «fodretta», the «patolino», all devotional practices which, appear indebted to the tradition of monastic orthopraxis. Subsequently, \nit is demonstrated how the work fits beautifully into a precise pietistic circuitry – that of exquisitely feminine monastic ceremonials – and how everything seems to be linked to characteristic objects of devotion to the Divine Infant, particularly to portable cradles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207