Impacto do Modelo de Calgary na Capacitação Familiar: Perspetiva da Enfermagem de Saúde Familiar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Segundo Hanson & Kaakinen (2005) cada sistema familiar apresenta características num determinado momento com o intuito de manter o equilíbrio funcional. Para melhor responder às exigências e movimentos de mudança a família não deve manter o mesmo funcionamento. O presente estudo propôs-se perceber em que medida a implementação de uma consulta de enfermagem familiar estruturada, baseada no Modelo de Calagary, aleado ao Modelo Circumplexo de Olson, influi na capacitação familiar. O estudo, caracterizado como quantitativo, descritivo e inferencial, do tipo pré-teste, pós-teste com grupo de controlo, envolveu 26 famílias. A implementação de uma consulta de enfermagem estruturada, tendo por base os constructos referidos anteriormente, permitiu potenciar a capacitação das potencialidades familiares e, subsequentemente, promover a resiliência familiar, pelo melhoramento funcional ao nível das dimensões coesão e adaptabilidade familiares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".