MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048103713

An investigation into the effects of plasma lipids on blood clotting activity in laying hens

2008· dissertation· en· W7048103713 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsPoultry Industry Council
KeywordsClotting factorHemostasisBlood clottingClotting timeBlood lipidsBlood plasmaCholesterolCoagulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lack of understanding the mechanism that causes liver hemorrhages has been an obstacle in reducing the incidence of Fatty Liver Hemorrhagic Syndrome (FLHS). The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the possible relationship between clotting factor activity and plasma lipid composition in normal and FLHS-susceptible laying hens. Lipid-depleted plasma showed significant decrease in Factor V, VII and X clotting activities. It was determined that omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids increased and decreased, respectively, clotting activity. A crossover feeding trial further confirmed that laying hens fed a diet high in omega-6 fatty acids exhibited higher clotting activity compared to laying hens fed a diet high in omega-3 fatty acids. Positive associations were also seen between liver hemorrhage score and percentage of liver weight. This thesis demonstrated that lipids are important in blood clotting in laying hens, but changes in hemostasis may not cause liver hemorrhages and FLHS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207