Julie Andrée T. : Capsules vidéos : Une bibliographie commentée en temps réel 2019 = Videoclips: An Annotated Bibliography in Real Time 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Graduate of Studio Arts at Concordia University (2000), and pursuing her doctoral degree in the program Études et pratiques des arts (UQAM), Julie Andrée T. works with performance and installation, situating the body and the space at the very center of her practice. She showed her performances in Europe and Canada, and she had solo exhibitions at Le lieu (Quebec), A Space (Toronto), Articule (Montreal), and Trace (Cardiff). Her practice explores the loss of identity, among other themes, straying from the codes of performance to underscore the graphic dimension of the work. It was with Not Waterproof / L’érosion d’un corps erroné and Rouge, presented at the Festival TransAmériques in 2009, that she found the theatrical vehicle she had been looking for: an installation-performance stemming from a perfect amalgam of graphic materials (body, painting, accessories, costumes, lights…) and sound elements. Regarded as an object, the body is often severely tested." -- Publisher's website.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.023 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".