MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7048146086

Impacts of oil well drilling noise on parental care and nestling condition of chestnut-collared longspurs (Calcarius ornatus)

2023· dissertation· en· W7048146086 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFledgeBroodNest (protein structural motif)Paternal careNoise (video)ForagingOffspringOil drilling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grassland songbird populations are in steep decline across North America, largely due to habitat loss. Oil and gas infrastructure and its associated noise are one of several factors impacting the remaining grasslands. Oil well operating noise affects the breeding behavior of several bird species, but the effects of drilling noise are less understood. Drilling noise occurs at a louder amplitude than chronic operating noise and is more unpredictable, which may affect songbirds to a greater extent. Chestnut-collared longspurs (Calcarius ornatus) are a species at risk in Canada and are dependent on mixed-grass prairie, much of which is impacted by oil and gas development. To determine the effects of oil well drilling noise on chestnut-collared longspur parental behavior, I created an experimental noise system and deployed cameras on 63 chestnut-collared longspur nests between 2019 and 2021 in southern Alberta. I reviewed and recorded parental behavior across over 800 hours of nest videos. I also measured the brood mass and the age at fledge at each nest to determine the effects of drilling well noise and parental care on nestling condition. Chestnut-collared longspur males provided less care near drilling noise, while female care was unaffected. Additionally, the infrastructure itself may have provided preferable foraging opportunities as parental care was higher closer to infrastructure. Nestling condition was not impacted by changes in paternal care, but surprisingly, more female care was associated with lower brood mass and a younger age at fledge. Drilling noise, independent of parental care, was associated with lower brood mass and an older age at fledge close to the infrastructure. My results suggest that the impacts of drilling noise on nestlings is not due to the effects of noise on parental care, even though paternal care is affected by drilling noise. Changes in both brood mass and the age at fledge have an impact on fledgling survival in songbirds and may affect population recruitment in chestnut-collared longspurs. Therefore, it is important to consider management strategies such as erecting temporary sound barriers or postponing drilling during peak breeding season to reduce the effects of drilling noise on chestnut-collared longspurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→