Jeszcze raz w Nibylandii. O polskich przekładach „Piotrusia Pana” Jamesa Matthew Barriego. Rekonesans eseistyczny
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All children, except one, grow up. Among all the masterpieces of global literature for children, this story surely cannot be defined as a fairytale, even though it tells of wondrous events, a remote island, fairies, mermaids and children that are able to fly. A journey to Neverland is a flight on the wings of imagination, covered with golden fairy dust, but once the travellers long for homecoming, they shall never see the island again. Peter Pan Or The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up (1904) was a spectacular success of the Scottish playwright James Matthew Barrie, whose own childhood was far away from idyllic happiness. Seven years after its opening night, the play was adapted by the author into a story for the little ones, but there are many themes and thoughts in the book that are stereotypically not meant for children. The experience of real-life (not making-believe) strongly marked the language and style of Peter Pan. The article focuses on the Polish translations of Peter and Wendy by J.M. Barrie, especially those created by Maciej Słomczyński (Przygody Piotrusia Pana, 2010) and Michał Rusinek (Piotruś Pan i Wendy, 2006). The author of the article analyses selected fragments of the texts and tries to establish a critical comparison between different translation strategies, showing that translator’s work with such a masterpiece is full of both challenges and surprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".