Le cheminement historiographique de Guy Fregault, 1936-1955
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quoiqu'on ait consacré à Fregault un bon nombre d'études, tout n'a pas été dit, bien au contraire. La plupart des auteurs le peignent sous les traits d'un historien fortement influencé par ses deux maitres successifs: Lionel Groulx puis Maurice Seguin, et pour cette raison plus ou moins novateur. Certes, Fregault avait une pensée perméable; le nier serait absurde. Néanmoins, il est tout aussi saugrenu de ne vouloir faire de son oeuvre qu'un sous-produit, ou au mieux une version des travaux de Groulx et Seguin. Dès son premier ouvrage, qui est aussi sa thèse de doctorat, une nouvelle interprétation se dessine en filigrane. Dans ses volumes subséquents, cette interprétation gagne en rigueur et en clarté; elle atteint un niveau de maturité appréciable. Tant et si bien qu'en 1955, année ou la maison Fides publie sa Guerre de la Conquête, Fregault peut prétendre au renouvellement de l'histoire du Canada d'avant 1760.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".