MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048265207

Labouring in rural space: the physical & social exclusion of Mexican migrant workers

2008· article· en· W7048265207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial exclusionMigrant workersOrder (exchange)ChinaEnablingScale (ratio)AgriculturePerspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the labour markets of countries of the Global North have necessitated influxes of migrant workers in order to overcome demographic deficits and fill essential employment vacancies. In few places is this more pronounced than in Canada, where thousands of foreign agricultural workers are flown in annually though increasingly ingrained transnational migration channels to supplement the domestic workforce. By adopting a rights-based perspective with emphasis on the scale of the individual, this presentation will examine manners in which Mexican migrant workers in southwestern Ontario's Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program (SAWP) are physically and socially excluded from Canadian society. To do this, we introduce the notion of ruralily as an enabler of exclusion. Next, we draw upon relevant literature to examine how exclusionary process are facilitated through structural, mobility, identity, and communication barriers, along with entrenched discrimination by 'host' societies. Finally, we argue that these forms of physical and social exclusion are deliberate, acting to perpetuate insecurity and exploitation in order to ensure the highest amount of revenue

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207