Les consultations préconciliaires des laïcs au Québec entre 1959 et 1962
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les laïcs avaient quelques devoirs à accomplir: prier pour le succès de l'évènement conciliaire et faire des efforts pour une sanctification personnelle. Au Québec, on a voulu leur donner la possibilité d'apporter leurs vœux et leurs suggestions lors de la phase préparatoire du concile. C'est ainsi qu'ont été organisées au Québec, à partir du mois d'octobre 1961, une série de 13 consultations préconciliaires des laïcs. Il s'agissait là d'un trait particulier au Québec puisque, dans le monde entier, nous n'en comptons pas autant. À l'étude des rapports rédigés suite à ces rencontres, nous découvrirons comment, à la veille de Vatican II, les laïcs percevaient leur Église locale, quelles étaient leurs principales doléances et suggestions. Nous ferons donc une analyse de contenu des rapports rédigés suite aux rencontres préconciliaires de Québec, Saint-Jérôme et Sainte-Anne-de-la-Pocatière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".