MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048353131

Investigating coupled deviations of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the surface ocean

2025· other· en· W7048353131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon dioxideCarbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphereSink (geography)Biogeochemical cycleOcean chemistryCarbon sinkCarbon cycleAtmosphere (unit)OxygenOcean observations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Behaviour of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the global ocean is often linked via physical and biogeochemical processes. Their deviations from atmospheric equilibrium determine whether the global ocean acts as a source or a sink for the two gases across various temporal and spatial scales, which eventually contributes to regulation of global climate and Earth’s life support system. Although these deviations are thought to be decoupled owing to the different restoration times of O2 and CO2, systematic comparisons of the two gases in the global surface ocean reveal unexpected coupled variations. The works presented in this thesis investigate O2 and CO2 dynamics in three heterogenous oceanic regions – the deep-water formation region of the Labrador Sea, the shallow coral-containing subtropical waters of the North Lagoon in Bermuda and the Southern Ocean. Surface O2 and CO2 deviations from atmospheric equilibrium in these three regions are found to be coupled. My study focuses on identifying possible drivers of these phenomena, the nature of their interactions and their impacts. The studies adopt the Carbon and Oxygen Relative to Saturation CORS method as the primary analytical technique in which deviations of dissolved O2 and CO2 concentrations are compared to one another using data from ships, mooring stations and floats as well as results from model simulations, in-situ monitoring and laboratory-generated measurements. The studies show that complex interactions of multiple processes drive the observed persistent O2 and CO2 excursions from atmospheric equilibrium. CORS results that were identified in earlier work as indicative of erroneous data are here shown instead to be real. This thesis introduces two novel analytical techniques: (1) a technique to quantify coral reef metabolism by using paired O2-CO2 measurements (“the O2-CO2 technique”), and (2) a technique to investigate CO2 data quality of floats by comparing against O2 data (“ the expected y-axis intercept method”). Finally, the works presented in this thesis provide new insights into the applications and implications of the CORS method as an insightful analytical tool in aquatic science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it