Lights back on at Washington Monument
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Washington Monument's lights are back on after going out for the second time in a week. A National Park Service spokesman said power went out at the monument about 5:30 p.m. and was restored after 7 p.m. The Washington Monument lights are back on after going out for the second time this month.A spokesman for the National Park Service says power went out at the monument about 5:30 Monday evening and was restored after 7 p.m.The lighting's been a bit faulty recently...The lights went out a few days earlier on January 3rd... officials said they went out around 7 p.m., but were on when electricians arrived the next morning.That outage was blamed on the monument's automated lighting system being out of sync.Unlike last week's outage, Monday's outage included the red aviation warning lights on top of the 555-foot-tall monument.The Parks spokesman says electricians traced the outage to a ground fault and'll continue investigating what went wrong.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".