Bibliographic record
Abstract
Migrant literature represents an important stage in the dynamics of Quebec literature, both scripturally and theoretically. The article first summarizes the structuring axiological elements of the Quebec literary field that, from the 1960s onwards, paved the way for the entry and integration of migrant authors into the Quebec canon. These include identity and cultural territorialization, felt to be incomplete by both Quebec authors (Jacques Ferron) and critics (Laurent Mailhot), and which Pierre Nepveu likens to migrant authors, emphasizing the similarities. The complimentary component of the process belongs to the Italo-Québécois and Haitians who, in the 1990s, thematized and theorized the exilic situation, transforming the perception of cultural and ethnic otherness into an existential, ethical and scriptural problematic translated by the concepts of nomadism and enracinerrance. Unlike his fellow exiles - Robert Berrouët-Oriol, Jean Claude Charles, Joël Des Rosiers - Émile Ollivier treats the exilic condition on two complementary levels. The first considers the nomadic-sedentary relationship from a historical perspective, noting the axiological overturn in favor of nomadism as the dominant human status in the postmodern world. The second deduces the philosophical consequences associated with writing. The discussion is illustrated by three works - the theoretical reflection Repérages (2001) and the two novels from the latest period Passages (1994) and La Brûlerie (2004). The analysis reveals the link between the exilic theme and the consequences Émile Ollivier draws from it for the structuring of spatiality, narration and the status of writing as a manifestation of the dynamics of the void. As an example of an integrating process, Émile Ollivier's poetics anticipates certain post-2000 trends in Quebec literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".