La Cultura Latinoamericana dentro del Turismo Musical y sus principales productos Turísticos: Festivales y Premios.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente documento se trabajará en una alternativa turística que se encuadra dentro de la modalidad de turismo cultural, entendida como turismo musical. Se ha decidido elegir la vertiente latinoamericana, con el fin de dar a conocer el origen de sus distintos géneros y qué sucesos han ayudado a formar esta cultura musical, incomprendida para algunos y admirada por otros. Es \nimportante también, conocer qué elementos componen este tipo de turismo, su historia e influencias, así como los principales productos que ofrece (festivales y premios). \nSe realizará además un análisis comparativo de los principales festivales y premios dedicados a la música latina, en base a las características de cada uno de ellos, según la información obtenida, seguido de un estudio de los factores internos y externos (de los primeros), además de investigar otros lugares de interés, que se enclavan dentro del fenómeno turístico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".