La "Hermandad de San José" d'Albinyana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
REsuMEl darrer quart del segle XIX van nixer a molts pobles del Peneds una srie de germandats amb noms del santoral.Albinyana no en fou una excepci.la seva "Hermandad de san Jos" fou creada el 1885, es legalitz el 1898, qued paralitzada del 1939 al 1951 i s'exting sobtadament el 1965.Aquest treball recull la seva vida i miracles.ABstRACt A series of brotherhoods named after saints arose in many Peneds Area towns during the last quarter of the 19 th Century.Albinyana was no exception to this: its "Hermandad de san Jos" (saint Joseph's Brotherhood) was founded in 1885 and registered in 1898; it remained inactive from 1939 to 1951 and it suddenly dissolved in 1965.this survey depicts its whole life story.EXPlICACI la creaci de Germandats -dites llavors "Hermandades"-al Peneds esclat les darreres dcades del segle XIX.Totes elles eren de tipus benfic i batejades amb noms del santoral.Aix, els anys 1871-72 se'n fund una als Monjos amb la denominaci de "Montepo bajo el patrocinio del Glorioso Patriarca San Jos", que es convert en "Hermandad" el 1888.El 1892, a Can Rubi, del mateix terme, es fund la "Hermandad de Socorros Mutuos bajo el ttulo de la Virgen del Pilar". (1)A la Bisbal, possiblement el 1879, es cre la "Hermandad de la Pursima Concepcin", i el 1888 la "Hermandad de San Jos". (2) Donats aquests precedents -i molts d'altres que en podrem trobar arreu i que no fan al cas-, no s estrany que a Albinyana sorgs tamb la necessitat de voler assegurar les mancances que, per invalidesa o accidents propis del treball agrcola, podrien patir els vens.La idea es materialitz l'any 1885.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".