Letter to Alex. Hamilton, Queenston, from David Thorburn, House of Assembly, 5 December 1836
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Letter to Alex. Hamilton, Queenston, from David Thorburn, House of Assembly. The letter concerns the War Loss bill. It is written that the War Loss bill has been assented to by His Majesty, and as soon as the Governor directs the Receiver General to pay the sufferers, it will be done as soon after as he can raise the money. He notes that payment can only be received by the sufferer or their appointed power of attorney, and asks that Hamilton send him his power of attorney so that he can attend to the business on his behalf. He states that it may be a few weeks before the Receiver General will be ready to pay, but due notice will be given through the Gazette. He notes that he is very anxious that the petitions concerning the Welland Canal be received, as the Welland Canal Committee of investigation have made a first report. The House was put into a committee and the debate continued till the House adjourned. He thinks that Mr. Merritt will get the House to adopt all that he could desire and provides further details of the anticipated funding. He states that he has sent a letter to Mr. Rorback, who has been selected to carry the petition from Stamford up and to hasten the petitioners, December 5, 1836. Postmarked City of Toronto DE 5 1836.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.184 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".