MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048630602

Locusts, Roaches, And Ants: The Music Of The Web Reviewing Community

2002· other· en· W7048630602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotocathodes and Microchannel Plates
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisclaimerAmateurRhymeGeorge (robot)VerisimilitudeMusic industryFunkUndoing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mid-to-late 90s, various independent writers began reviewing music online. These gradually formed a lose community through linking to and commenting on each others pages. Today, many of these websites have either expired or been taken down, with MarkPrindle.com existing as a notable exception, and the Discord And Rhyme podcast existing as a notable offshoot. Many of the music reviewers were amateur musicians themselves, and so the decision was made to make a compilation album. Officially listed as "Vol. 1", there was no "Vol. 2". Tracklist: 1. The Other Leading Brand - "Ritalin Rock (Purity Of Essence)" 2. Steve Knowlton And The Knowl-Tones - "Saskatchewan" 3. Willie Simpson - "Dead In 41" 4. Disclaimer - "Hell" 5. Mike Kozak - "Walk Me Home" 6. Adam Johansson & Joel Larsson - "Gamie Klassiker" 7. Monkey Syndicate - "Heterosapiens" 8. Mark Prindle "Jogging Is the Bestest/A Guy Said My Web Site Is Overrated (Why Does Everybody Hate Me So Much?)/My Songs Would Be Significantly Less Sucky If I Bothered to Save Up for More Powerful Recording Equipment" 9. Daniel Fjall - "The Drapes" 10. Poly Lite Plus - "Fun Festival" 11. The Hector Collectors - "Tantric New Romantic" 12. Physical Illusion - "The Open Window" 13. Joe Hinchcliffe - "Mercury's Star"

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0160.008
Scholarly communication0.0210.011
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicPhotocathodes and Microchannel PlatesFrench-language works237,207